The message here is that we all live in an inner world as well as an outward one. It is possible for astrology to work on the inner plane without leaving a visible ripple on the surface of life. A good astrologer must be alert to that reality, while a bad one thinks only in concrete, outward terms of “predicting what will happen,” limiting the scope of that question to the positions of the atoms and molecules in the outer world.
While I stand by the basic point I am making here, I’d like to affirm that it represents a rather rare situation. Generally, because of the way the principle of synchronicity weaves through astrology, there are outward expressions of most transits as well as inward expressions. They may be subtle, but they are usually present. Our protagonist in the previous scenario might, for example, experience a 30-second flirtation with a stranger.
See the connection with her inner changes? She might click on Match.com, take a nervous peek, and then quickly X-out of it. These are obviously microscopic events, easily ignored. But they are the subtle outward manifestations of the far more dramatic pattern of inner realizations.
An astrologer could be forgiven for not noticing them, but angels notice everything.
Let’s move onward to a third reason for astrology’s apparent failures.
HOW BADLY DOES THIS TRANSIT NEED TO HAPPEN?
A nearly fail-safe astrological principle is that no transit or progression happens unless it needs to happen – they all represent evolutionary necessities. They are all essentially soul-contracts we signed with the universe, right along with our first breaths. One way to express it is to say that we are all sick – and transits and progressions are the medicine. Calling us “all sick” sounds too negative, but ultimately why are we here, on this earth, in these physical bodies? Earth is not the most prestigious address in the galaxy. It is good to be alive and there is no shame in being here locked into these vehicles of flesh and bone, but it’s just one stage in a larger evolutionary journey – an evolutionary journey is reflected in your birthchart, while transits and progressions simply trigger its unfolding stages. The point is, they always happen when they need to, always at the right time. They arise to expand something in our awareness, to correct something, to heal something.
With those broad philosophical points established, let’s recognize that at a given moment, some of us might need firmer correction than others. How far off-target are you in your life? How much of a bite has spiritual laziness taken out of your higher potentials? Like the rest of us, you’ve had your soul-victories and you’ve probably had your spiritual prat-falls too.
All of this leads to the key point: the vigor of a transit is connected to how big a “correction” or “lesson” is appropriate for you. And that is not something that we can see in your chart. The answer has to do with how well you have been responding to your chart all along.
Back to Uranus transiting into that hypothetical woman’s seventh house. Even if she is in a happy relationship, she still has her own path to follow in life. How successfully has she balanced the compromising realities of partnership with fidelity to her own journey and her own nature? Those are always knotty questions. Naturally we all make mistakes. She is presumably no exception. Out of love for a partner, we might compromise too much sometimes, perhaps without even knowing we are doing it. Or maybe we are so pig-headed, selfish, and stubborn that we find “meeting in the middle” offensive.
Along comes Uranus with this woman’s report card.
Illustration: she has been “an obedient, pliant wife,” sacrificing herself to the needs of her husband and family to the point that she has become almost a phantom in her own world. Uranus hits her hard. Perhaps it truly feels like “the Lord of Earthquakes and Lightning bolts has entered her House of Marriage.”
What happens?
Maybe she finally blows up – abandons the marriage, has an affair, moves to South America under an assumed name. Spectacular stuff! And the fortune-telling astrologer is of course delighted by the accuracy of his or her over-the-top prediction.
More likely, given this hypothetical woman’s passive nature, she experiences the transit internally, but in a dark way. She gives up. She withdraws further into emotional dissociation. She chooses to become a zombie in her own life. And maybe her husband doesn’t notice a thing.
Angels notice, and they weep.
The underlying concept here is that our protagonist badly needed this Uranus transit. The evolutionary requirement it represented was pressing, so the “fault line was locked and loaded” and the earthquake promised to be huge.
And it was huge – in one scenario, she divorced. We just have to be sensitive to the notion of an “inner earthquake” as well as the more pyrotechnical outward one.
In these scenarios, we obviously would not be looking at “astrology failing.” But what if the initial situation were far milder and the necessary “correction” not so dramatic?
Earlier, looking at the same transit, we imagined one partner telling another that she was “skipping their usual family vacation and going to a week-long astrology seminar.” Her partner had no problem with that – he wanted to zoom off on a motorcycle anyway. In that case, the necessary Uranian corrections were far smaller and the evolutionary necessity simply less charged. Two wise humans simply make room for more individuality in their partnership. They are both happier and they love each other more for it.
But remember: for the astrologer thinking Uranus in the seventh house “‘means divorce,” nothing happened.
There’s yet another reason that astrology can sometimes fail . . . and in this case, actually fail.
ASTROLOGY IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
Most modern astrologers shudder at the thought of trying to practice our craft without any knowledge of Uranus, Neptune, or Pluto. And yet up until about a century ago, at least one of those planets was missing.
In parallel fashion, I often think of the plight of our astrological forebears in ancient Greece, Egypt or China, working before the invention of the clock. How could they do astrology properly with only a vague sense of anyone’s birth time? They found ways to work around the problem – but I’m grateful to have a nice, timed Ascendant and accurate house cusps in any chart I contemplate today.
Going further, I’ve come increasingly to realize that it is a big mistake to leave Eris – a trans-Neptunian planet the size of Pluto – out of our thinking. But I admit I still don’t use it as much as I should – not yet, at any rate. But, like astrology, I am a work-in-progress too.
Up until maybe a dozen years ago, I didn’t know much about declination. I shake my head as I think of all the readings I did for people born with the Moon Out of Bounds without my knowing it, understanding it, or mentioning it.
The list goes on. The point is that I am sure there are many undiscovered astrological techniques and factors out there lurking in the future, waiting for unborn astrologers to come along and find them.
The system has always been – and probably always will be – a work in progress.
For our purposes in this little essay, my next thoughts provide a twist on the main subject. What we have been exploring is what is going on when a known transit or progression seems to fail. Here, we look at the mirror-image – what about when something happens in life, but there doesn’t seem to be anything going on astrologically to explain it? That’s another kind of “astrology fails” scenario.
Any honest astrologer will acknowledge this reality. When it happens, is there some exotic force at play – an undiscovered planet, for example? That is undoubtedly true sometimes – how could it be otherwise? That there are undiscovered planets is a virtual certainty – and, ditto, that they have astrological meaning.
There are “ghosts in the astrological machine,” for sure.
Now for a little bit of lead in our shoes – when something happens “without an astrological explanation,” the reason might possibly be a lot more prosaic. As an astrological teacher, when a student complains that he or she can’t see any astrology to go along with a big biographical event, my mind immediately goes to a less exotic notion than “undiscovered planets.” I cannot count how many times I’ve heard a student say, “Oh, I never use solar arcs” or “Oh, I didn’t notice that the Moon had entered its Balsamic phase . . .”
When astrology fails, have we just not looked hard enough at what was before our eyes in the chart? Is it a gap in our own technical knowledge rather than some fundamental hole in astrological theory that has made a monkey out of us?
Our present arsenal of astrological techniques is certainly incomplete, but it is already quite vast and impressively powerful – and let’s just add the obvious corollary: it requires considerable effort to rise to a high level of skill in this craft. I believe fervently in free will – but please never confuse it with bad technique! Most of the time when an astrologer can’t see the fingerprints of the planets on an accident or a new relationship or whatever, the explanation boils down to not looking hard enough.
When astrology fails, there is still one more serious possibility to consider . . .
IS THE CHART ITSELF WRONG?
Astrology depends upon a long, complex chain of principles. By far its weakest link is our dependency on accurate birth information. Even novice astrologers know to mistrust a birth time given simply as “around noon” or to cringe when we hear that “mom says it was around 6:00.”
Even a birth time given as “7:22 pm” can be misleading. What does “the moment of birth” actually, specifically, mean? How accurate were the clocks on the walls?
When I was a teenager and starting to get interested in astrology, I asked my mom for my birth time. She confidently told me, “6:15 am.” Later I found my baby book. It turns out that I was born about three hours earlier – but I weighed 6 pounds, 15 ounces.
Never, ever, trust your own mother.
It is always possible that the source of a wrong “prediction” – even if we are wise enough to be predicting questions rather than answers – is simply a wrong chart. Garbage in, garbage out, as they say in the world of computing. It is of course an obvious cheap trick to blame “a wrong chart” for our own errors. When it seems that “astrology is not working,” do first consider all the points we’ve already explored. Still, if there is a consistent pattern of errors and the chart simply seems “not to fit the person,” then beware: you might be working with bad data.
Generally such errors are matters of minutes. As such, they would not have much impact, for example, on the timing of a Uranus transit to the natal Moon – a few minutes isn’t going to move the natal Moon very far. But even a few minutes of error can move a house cusp significantly – the average figure there being about one degree of error for every four minutes of error in the time of birth.
It can get a lot worse.
In my experience with older birth certificates and handwritten records, it is not unusual for the numeral “1” to be transcribed in error as a “7.” Worse, an “AM” might have been clerically mangled into a “PM,” producing a chart that is 12 hours off. Even the position of the Moon would then be wrong by something like six degrees. And of course everything would be in a totally wrong house. Those are “penmanship” mistakes and obviously they are more of a peril for people born before, say, 1985 or so. Nowadays, birth records tend to be more computerized and typically entered via keyboards. Time will tell if the “improved penmanship” balances out the tendency toward sloppy data-entry errors.
I have had experiences where I was left confident that someone’s parents had misled a child as to his or her actual birth date – for example, to conceal a pregnant bride. This is less of an issue nowadays, but it would be foolish to ignore it, especially with clients born before the social revolutions of the 1970s.
One more source of potential catastrophe: beware that 11/8/68 means November 8, 1968 to an American and August 11, 1968 to a French person. That one has fouled me up more than once too.
The bottom line is always take birth data with a grain of salt. If your predictions aren’t working, an error at that most fundamental level could possibly be the cause of your problems.
A helpful hint – such errors would have to be consistent over many transits and progressions before you take them seriously. If it happens only once in a chart that has otherwise proven reliable, go back and think about the other possibilities we’ve been exploring.
I’ll close by echoing once again that, in my opinion, astrology never fails. The statement might sound arrogant, but I believe it to be true. As I contemplate its meaning, its power actually has the opposite effect on me – rather than feeling puffed up, I feel humbled by it. I’m the poor astrologer who has to try to live up to that challenge. In my bones, I know that a good answer to a trusting client’s most pivotal soul-questions lies there before me on that single sheet of paper. He or she has come to me, counting on my wise counsel. And while astrology never fails, astrologers sometimes do.
Me too.
AlI I can do is to practice as wisely as I can within my own limits – and to constantly struggle to press those limits further in the direction of wisdom and skill.
Add love, and maybe some humility, and it is a privilege and a joy to practice this sacred craft, even with all my warts.